Extradition, when an individual is returned to another nation to be tried or punished for crimes committed. It is a legal and judicial
process that involves the physical transfer of custody of the individual to the
legal authority of the requesting jurisdiction.
Principle of Reciprocity - Every favour, respect, reward, or punishment one country grants to its inhabitants or legal residents must be reciprocated (repaid) similarly.
Principle
of Double Criminality - The extradition of the suspect or
convicted person must also constitute a crime in the territorial state. It
implies that the fugitive’s actions must be illegal in both the seeking and territorial states.
Principle
of Double Jeopardy - A Person who has already been
prosecuted and sentenced for the same crime and cannot be extradited again.
Except for the expired period of punishment, no offender tried and convicted
once may be extradited for the same offence
Principle
of Speciality - The extradited offender may only be
tried or punished for the crime for which he was extradited by the requesting
state.
Extraditable
persons
The suspects or criminal defendants must not fall into one of the following three categories to be extraditable.
Territorial state’s own
nationals - Most countries assert their right to exercise State sovereignty
over their citizens, even though the crime was committed in another country,
and refuse to extradite their own citizens accused of committing a crime
in the other country.
Political offenders - The
fact that many nations refuse to extradite political offenders is one of the
most contentious aspects of extradition.
Persons already
punished - Most nations
uphold the principle of double jeopardy and decline to extradite individuals
who have already been convicted and sentenced for the same crime for which
extradition was demanded.
Extraditable
crimes
The principle of double
criminality is used to establish which crimes are extraditable, which requires
that the fugitive’s actions be crimes in both the territorial state and the
state making the request. In general, most crimes stated in the extradition
agreement between the two states are extraditable, except for the following offences.
Religious
offence - contempt for religion are not extraditable
Military Offences - Like
deserting, refusing to follow orders from higher officials, etc., are not
extraditable.
o The
Extradition Act of 1962 governs the extradition of an accused or convicted
(fugitive) in India. 48 nations presently have extradition agreements with
India.
o India
has extradition arrangements with 12 countries: Fiji, Italy, Peru, Singapore,
Sri Lanka, Antigua & Barbuda, New Zealand, Croatia, Armenia, Sweden, Papua
New Guinea and Tanzania
o The
extradition procedure, terms, and conditions are governed by the Extradition
Act and any applicable bilateral treaties, agreements, and international
covenants.
o The
Extradition Act allows for either the extradition of fugitive offenders from
foreign jurisdictions with extradition agreements or treaties with India or the
extradition of fugitive criminals to foreign states.
o The
Extradition Act governs the extradition procedure for foreign nations without
formal extradition agreements or treaties with India.
o The
“Guidelines on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters” which describes the
policies and procedures for making an extradition request, is released by the
Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).
Procedure
for Extradition from India
The process for the
extradition of a fugitive criminal from India begins when the request of a
wanted criminal from India is sent.
The fugitive is sent to
the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) Consular, Passport and Visa (CPV)
Division through diplomatic channels along with the necessary supporting
documentation (GOI).
The Magistrate of
Extradition (often a Magistrate of First Class) must issue an arrest warrant as
soon as the GOI receives it.
Based on his detailed
assessment, the magistrate issued the warrant for the subject’s arrest.
Procedure
for Extradition to India
o When
the Consular, Passport and Visa (CPV) Division of the Ministry of External
Affairs (MEA), GOI receives a request from the legally qualified Magistrate in
India following the establishment of a case against the fugitive, process for
that criminal to India from the territorial state officially commences.
o The
magistrate sends the request with pertinent documentation and an
open-dated arrest warrant.
o An
inquiry magistrate receives the request after it has been duly transmitted to the territorial state through diplomatic channels.
Restrictions on
Surrender Under Indian Law
According to Section 31
of the Act, a fugitive is not required to surrender under the following conditions:
Is of a political nature, is
time-barred; If there is no clause specifying that the extradited person cannot
be tried, If he has been charged with an offence in India other than the one
for which extradition is being sought, and until fifteen days have passed since
the date the magistrate committed him to prison.
Vinayak
Damodar Savarkar 1910- Britain to India 1910 aboard the
ship Morea in preparation for his treason and murder trial (Emperor v. Vinayak
Damodar Savarkar (1910)).
Abu
Salem Extradition Case - He was part of the 1993 Bombay blasts. They were accused of murder, extortion,
narcotics trafficking, money laundering, and other crimes, accused in the 1993
Mumbai Serial Blasts case. In 2007, extradition agreements between India and
Portugal were signed, and Abu Salem was sent to India. His writ case under Article 32 was denied by the Supreme Court of India in January 2021. In July
2022, the Supreme Court held that Abu Salem's life sentence be commuted to 25 years, and he should be released by November 2030.
Vijay
Mallya Extradition - non-payment of loan (Rs 60000 crore)
Vijay Mallya ran away to London, United Kingdom, in 2016., accused under The Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 by the
Indian government. Mr Mallya was the
first to be designated a “Fugitive Economic Offender.” India requested the extradition of
Mallya from the UK in 2017, which was granted.
Nirav
Modi Extradition case - The Central Bureau of Investigation
(CBI) received a complaint from the Punjab National Bank (PNB) in 2018 accusing
Nirav and his wife, Mrs Ami Modi, of acquiring fake Letters of Understanding
(Lou) worth $11,400 crores through fraud.
Interpol issued a Red Corner Notice on him for money laundering in June
2018. He has not, however, been sent
to India while some court proceedings are ongoing, and he has not used up all of
his legal options in the UK.
Extradition
case of Surjit Badesha and Malkit Kaur Sidhu - abduction
and murder of Jaswinder Kaur Sidhu (Canada citizens). Surjit Badesha and Malkit
Kaur were found guilty and extradited to India in 2019.
Extradition
of Kishan Singh - Obtained British citizenship in 2015. He
participated actively in the global drug cartel. He sold drugs, including
narcotics, in various nations, including the UK and India. With the assistance
of the Indian athlete Harpreet Singh and others, he managed this supply
chain. He was extradited to India.
The United Nations
Model Treaty on Extradition (1990) - Analysis of the requirements and challenges managed nations face during
extradition procedures. It contains 18 Articles.
The United Nations
Model Law on Extradition (2004) - to improve global cooperation According to Sections 5 and 6 of the Model
Law, extradition shall not be allowed if, in the opinion of the territorial
State, the extradition is requested for torturing or punishing the fugitive based on his caste, ethnic origin, race, etc.
Post a Comment