Background and Filing of PIL
Santosh Kumar Dohrey, representing the petitioner, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) against the Central government's notification. The petition argues that the notification lacks proper authority and employs language that insults the Constitution.
Legal Proceedings and Arguments
The PIL, filed through advocate Braj Mohan Singh, was brought before the division bench comprising Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Vikas Budhwar. The bench has issued a notice to the Union Home Ministry, seeking its response to the petition. The next hearing is scheduled for July 31.
Dohrey contends that the notification, issued by a Joint Secretary of the Ministry of Home Affairs, uses language that insults the Constitution. Specifically, the PIL argues that labelling June 25 as 'Constitution Murder Day' violates the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act. The petition emphasizes that the term 'murder' in conjunction with the Constitution is inappropriate, given that the Emergency was declared under constitutional provisions.
Conclusion
The petitioner asserts that the Constitution is a dynamic document that cannot be destroyed or deemed dead, thereby challenging the validity of such notification. The case raises crucial questions about the use of language in official notifications and the boundaries of commemorative acts under constitutional scrutiny.
Our news media partner, Kaushiki Srivastava, crafted and curated this news.
WHATSAPP CHANNEL -
TELEGRAM CHANNEL - https://t.me/learnwithsakshi03
LinkedIn account -
Instagram -
https://www.instagram.com/_sakshinchaos_?igsh=MTRobXA5eG9jY3AzMw%3D%3D&utm_source=qr
FOR ANY QUERY, EMAIL US ON - hustlinglearning@gmail.com
Post a Comment